图片物联网app开发

期刊简介

图片

《海外政事经济学驳斥》(Review of International Political Economy)是一份涵盖海外政事经济学揣摸的双月刊同业评审学术期刊。其造就于1999年，由Routledge出书。本刊是海外政事经济学范围的主流期刊之一，与《新政事经济学》(New Political Economy)并排。2022年该刊影响因子为4.3。

本期目次

01

社会环境打破与地皮贬责：中国在阿根廷基础门径投资揣摸

Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina

02

“非认真”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制混杂性

Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state

03

主权危急金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的相比

International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures

04

核不扩散轨制复合体系的不放心性

The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex

05

贬责网罗空间：跨组织的战略范畴的政事

Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations

06

竞争与轨制的复杂架构：海外训诫中的巨擘关系与分化

Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education

07

海外轨制复合体的品级与分化：相比揣摸的表面框架

Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research

上期奖号和值为97，最近十期和值分别为116 105 118 106 100 103 84 137 64 97，最近十期和值分布在64-137之间。综合分析本期预计红球和值出现在123左右。

app

上期龙头开出奇数号码05，近10期龙头奇数号码开出7次，偶数号码开出3次，本期优先考虑奇数号码，龙头参考05。

08

海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、战略变化与合作

Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes

本期提要

社会环境打破与地皮贬责：中国在阿根廷基础诱惑投资揣摸

题目：Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina

作家：Sol Mora，圣马丁国立大学政事与政府学院阿根廷国度科学本领揣摸委员会 (CONICET) 的博士后揣摸员。

提要：本文通过分析地皮贬责——相当是通过中国基础门径投资在阿根廷试图实施的地皮取得，在新葛兰西主见方法和拉丁好意思洲政事生态学之间建立了对话。在这两种不雅点之间架起桥梁，将罗伯特·考克斯的框架应用于地皮贬责固有的社会和环境打破的揣摸。对阿根廷的两个地皮取得筹办的揣摸，其中一个被暂停，一个修改后延续进行，标明社会禁止不错制约通过投资过甚履行进行地皮限度的尝试。因此，这两种表面不雅点之间的对话不仅使考克斯的念念想欣忭活力，而且将环境和当然贬责经过中的社会环境打破算作IPE的新揣摸场合。

This article establishes a dialogue between the neo-Gramscian approach and Latin American Political Ecology by analyzing land governance – specifically attempts at land grabbing through Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina. Building bridges between these two perspectives enables an application of Robert Cox’s framework to the study of socio-environmental conflicts inherent to land governance. The study of two land grabbing initiatives in Argentina, one that was suspended and one that continues with modifications, shows that social resistance can condition attempts at land control through investments and their execution. Consequently, the dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives not only revitalizes Cox’s thought but also highlights socio-environmental conflicts in environmental and nature governance processes as a new research direction for IPE.

“非认真”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制混杂性

题目：Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state

作家：Danish Khan，好意思国富兰克林与马歇尔学院经济系助理诠释兼“不对等、浮泛、权柄和社会正义倡议”聚会主任。

提要：比年来，海外政事经济学（IPE）学者越来越关心城市问题。然则，他们主要关心的是特定的少数几个全球“城市”在调养成本、商品和工作的全球流动中的扮装。尽管如斯，IPE文件中存在一个紧迫的空缺在于对新开脱主见全球化程度怎样影响和法式位于全球南边城市的低收入“非认真”住房部门的探索有限。为了弥补现存IPE文件中的这一空缺，本文在新开脱主见积蓄轨制的配景下，对非正规住房假寓点的变成和铲除经过进行了批判性分析。非正规住房假寓点也曾得到了批判性地地舆学家和城市揣摸范围学者的庸俗揣摸。本文游刃有余之处在于对IPE文件方面作念出了独有的孝顺，即诓骗非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学算作批判性分析社会履行论和后殖民国度内在矛盾的切入点。本文以为，通过“轨制混杂性”的视角不错更好地清爽非正规住房假寓点与后殖民国度之间的关系。这个主张指的是后殖民国度内矛盾的社会经济和轨制刺激的交融，旨在同期经管社会再分娩和成本主见积蓄。社会再分娩和积蓄之间固有的张力在非正规住房假寓点中以“仁慈-暴力”的辩证法形状施展出来。一方面，后殖民国度试图通过多眉目的权柄网罗“允许”边际化群体建立非正规住房假寓点，以施展出“仁慈”的形象。另一方面，一朝边际化群体间隔了房地产主导的成本主见积蓄，后殖民国度将接管暴力技巧终结他们。因此，本文以为，IPE学者应仔细磋议非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学，因为它提供了联系后殖民国度怎样受到调控并被不同的新开脱主见全球化社会经济力量拉扯的机制的深切见地。

In recent years, International Political Economy (IPE) scholars have increasingly turned their attention to cities. However, their primary focus has been on the role of a select few global 'cities’ that regulate global flows of capital, goods, and services. Nonetheless, a significant gap in the IPE literature pertains to the limited exploration of how processes of neoliberal globalization are impacting and regulating the low-income 'informal’ housing sector in cities located in the global South. To address this gap in the existing IPE literature, this paper critically analyzes the processes of formation and demolition of informal housing settlements against the backdrop of the neoliberal regime of accumulation. Informal housing settlements have been extensively examined by critical geographers and scholars in the field of urban studies. What distinguishes this paper is its unique contribution to the literature on IPE, that is, it utilizes the political economy of informal housing settlements as an entry point to critically analyze social ontology and the inherent contradictions of the postcolonial state. The paper argues that the relationship between informal housing settlements and the postcolonial state can be better understood through the lens of the 'institutional hybridity.’ This concept refers to the fusion of contradictory socio-economic and institutional impulses within the postcolonial state, which aims to manage social reproduction and capitalist accumulation simultaneously. The inherent tension between social reproduction and accumulation manifests in the informal housing settlements in the form of a dialectic of 'benevolence-violence.’ On one hand, the postcolonial state attempts to appear 'benevolent’ towards marginalized groups by 'allowing’ them to establish informal housing settlements through a multi-layered network of clientelism. On the other hand, the postcolonial state resorts to violent displacement of marginalized groups as soon as they pose obstacles to real estate-led capitalist accumulation. Thus, the paper contends that IPE scholars should carefully consider the political economy of informal housing settlements, as it provides captivating insights into the mechanisms through which the postcolonial state becomes subject to regulation and is pulled in different directions by the socio-economic forces of neoliberal globalization.

主权危急金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的相比

题目：International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures

作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外工作学院海外经济关系诠释。

提要：海外轨制复杂性表面框定了海外合作的预期，这种预期源自不同机构体系中品级和各异化组合。本文相比了2000年至2019年时代，东亚、拉丁好意思洲和欧元区危急金融区域复杂体系中地区金融安排与海外货币基金组织之间的关系，并对磨真金不怕火了这些预期。算作全球和地区机构之间的错乱国度，债权国在选拔这些复杂体系的架构（品级和各异化的组合）方面尤其具有影响力，但受到前几十年所收受的安排的方法。一朝选拔了复杂体系的架构，它反过来将影响借款国的战略调养和国度在不清闲机构时是追求轨制革新如故建立竞争性轨制。这些发现总体上适宜预期，但超出了核神思论对欧元区战略调养的预期程度。机构间的和谐动态填补了这一解释差距。本文的论断是，机构之间的关系关于清爽轨制复杂体系的收尾和演变至关紧迫，况且比单一轨制主见、权柄差距假说和其他替代方法提供的解释更竣工。

The theory of international regime complexity that frames this study specifies expectations for international cooperation stemming from different combinations of hierarchy and differentiation among institutions in regime complexes. This paper compares relationships between regional financial arrangements and the International Monetary Fund in the regional complexes for crisis finance in East Asia, Latin America, and the euro area during 2000-2019 and tests these expectations. Creditor states that sit at the nexus between global and regional institutions are particularly influential in the choice of architecture (the combination of hierarchy and differentiation) for these complexes but are constrained by arrangements inherited from previous decades. Once chosen, the complex’s architecture in turn shapes policy adjustment in borrowing countries and influences whether states pursue regime shifting or competitive regime creation when dissatisfied with institutions. These findings generally coincide with expectations, but exceed the degree of policy adjustment that the core theory expected for the euro area. Interinstitutional collaboration, the dynamics of which are elaborated, fills this explanatory gap. The paper concludes that relations among institutions are essential for understanding the outcomes and evolution of regime complexes and underpin a more complete explanation than provided by singular institutionalism, the power-gap hypothesis and other alternative approaches.

核不扩散轨制复合体系的不放心性

题目：The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex

作家：Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni，剑桥大学政事与海外揣摸系海外组织和全球政事学诠释

提要：本文对核不扩散轨制复合体系的轨制架构中旅途依赖性的变化进行了表面分析，并分析了不同轨制复合结构对机构竞争和战略调养的影响。起头，我提倡了一个一般性表面，叙述了海外轨制复合体系（IRCs）的先有的轨制结构若缘何一种使IRC易于内生旅途依赖性变化的形状促进和方法随后的轨制发展。接下来，我叙述了在核不扩散复合体系中，轨制革新和竞争性轨制建立策略怎样激发了旅途依赖性的“反馈序列”，导致轨制分裂日益加重。为了阐述IRC演变的内生能源，我在三个“要津时刻”扫视了核不扩散复合体系：20世纪70年代中期、冷战完了时期和21世纪初。在每个时期，外生的扩散冲击与现存的机构结构互相作用，产生了特定的竞争模式，从而激发了日益加重的轨制分裂的反馈序列。我的论点关于全球经济贬责具有庸俗的适用性，并对约束增长的海外政事经济学文件探讨全球贬责机构中的反馈序列和轨制雕残具有紧迫兴味。

This article theorizes path-dependent changes in the institutional architecture of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex; it analyses the effects of different regime-complex structures on institutional contestation and policy adjustment. I first offer a general theory of how the preexisting institutional structures of international regime complexes (IRCs) facilitate and constrain subsequent institutional developments in ways that make IRCs prone to endogenous, path-dependent change. Next, I illustrate how strategies of regime shifting and rival regime creation in the nuclear nonproliferation complex have triggered path-dependent 'reactive sequencing’, resulting in growing institutional fragmentation. To illustrate endogenous dynamics of IRC evolution, I examine the nuclear nonproliferation complex at three 'critical junctures’: The mid-1970s, the end of the Cold War, and the early-2000s. During each period, exogenous proliferation shocks interacted with pre-existing institutional structures to produce specific patterns of contestation which set in motion a reactive sequence of growing institutional fragmentation. My argument has relevance for global economic governance broadly and for the growing IPE literature which explores reactive sequencing and institutional decay in global governance institutions.

贬责网罗空间：跨组织的战略范畴的政事

题目：Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations

作家：Stephanie C. Hofmann，欧洲大学揣摸所政事与社会科学系诠释和罗伯特·舒曼高档揣摸中心海外关系聚会主席；Patryk Pawlak，联系我们卡内基欧洲揣摸中心的探员学者和欧洲大学揣摸所（佛罗伦萨）罗伯特·舒曼高档揣摸中心兼职诠释。

提要：战略范畴和问题互相依存并非是既定的。它们所波及的横蛮关系——由谁贬责、怎样贬责以及战略范围在那边——跟着时代的推移被轨制化，这夙昔是由全球朔方国度起头制定。咱们对这些横蛮关系如安在组织里面和跨组织轨制化的形状知之甚少。为此，咱们通过探究一个新兴战略范围如安在一个高度轨制化的环境中，怎样和取得什么成果来填补这个空缺。咱们以为，新战略范围，如网罗空间或东谈主工智能，促使政府改换资源通过将远景性的问题团员在新组织和现存组织中进行择地选拔战略框架，以诱惑定约合作。率先，志同谈合的国度在组织中更有可能产生共识，从而导致部分各异化的非品级轨制复合体。恒久而言，竞争性的压力调养，尤其南半球国度所感受到的压力，有助于激发轨制向一个和谐的一般性组织的轨制革新。要津的举止者必须再行调养他们的框架，从而减少各异。在现在的地缘政事寰球中，这加重了组织里面政事不对。咱们在网罗空间的案例中磨真金不怕火了三个命题，并展示了跨组织竞争框架的扩散怎样导致战略申辩革新到聚会国，而在聚会国只可进行破碎的战略调养。咱们的分析基于一手尊府和千里浸式策略。

Policy boundaries and issue interdependence are not a given. The stakes they imply—who governs, how, and where a policy domain is—become institutionalized over time, often first by the Global North. We know little about how these stakes are presented and institutionalized within and across organizations. We tackle this lacuna by asking how, and to what effect, an emerging policy domain is situated in a densely institutionalized environment. We argue that new policy domains such as cyberspace or artificial intelligence prompt resourceful governments to forum-shop policy frames by clustering promising issues in new and existing organizations in pursuit of coalition-building. Initially, resonance is more likely to be established in organizations with like-minded countries, leading to partially differentiated non-hierarchical regime complexes. In the long-term, competing adjustment pressures, particularly felt in the Global South, help trigger a regime-shift to an orchestrating general-purpose organization. Key actors must reconfigure their frames thereby reducing differentiation. In today’s geopolitical world, this hardens intra-organizational political differences. We examine three propositions in the case of cyberspace and show how the proliferation of competing frames across organizations led to shifting the policy debate to the UN, where only piecemeal policy adjustments are possible. Our analysis is based on primary sources and immersion strategies.

与轨制的复杂架构：海外训诫中的巨擘关系与分化

题目：Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education

作家：Rie Kijima，多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与大师战略学院的助理诠释；Phillip Y. Lipscy，多伦多大学政事学系和蒙克全球事务与大师战略学院诠释，及东京大学法学院诠释。

提要：轨制复杂性的决定成分和后果是什么？咱们以为，海外议题范围的特征——网罗效应和插足壁垒——影响了可行竞争的程度，并对巨擘关系、轨制各异化和实质性收尾产生了紧迫影响。竞争倾向于侵蚀现存轨制的主导地位，削弱品级轨制。竞争下的各异化因权柄和物资资源而异：宏大的国度试图通过引入无各异化的机构来改变近况，而资源有限的举止者则倾向于针对各异化的利基商场。实质性收尾的各异取决于运行的轨制建立，相当是在率先被赋予权柄的举止者更可能从竞争中失利。咱们通过揣摸海外训诫轨制复杂体系（这是一个具有极其紧迫性但频繁被冷落的议题范围）来发展这个表面并测试四个假定。

What are the determinants and consequences of regime complexity? We argue that characteristics of international issue areas – network effects and entry barriers – affect the degree of feasible competition, with important consequences for authority relations, institutional differentiation, and substantive outcomes. Competition tends to erode the dominance of status quo institutions, diminishing hierarchy. Differentiation under competition varies according to power and material resources: Powerful states seek to shift the status quo by introducing undifferentiated institutions, while actors with limited resources tend to target differentiated niches. Variation in substantive outcomes depends on the initial configuration of institutions, particularly which actors are originally empowered and thus stand to lose from competition. We develop this theory and test four hypotheses by examining the regime complex for international education, a substantively important but often neglected issue area.

海外轨制复合体的品级与分化：相比揣摸的表面框架

题目：Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research

作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外工作学院海外经济关系诠释；Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理诠释。

提要：海外轨制复杂性的主张提供了一个灵验的视角来揣摸全球贬责中海外机构的约束增多。越来越多的海外政事经济学（IPE）文件指出，很多紧迫战略范围存在叠加的机构集群，然则一些学者以为，复杂性削弱了贬责效用，而另一些学者则以为踱步的机构优于归拢的机构。为了使这些发现具有连贯性，咱们提倡了一个一般的表面框架，基于两个结构特征来描绘轨制复杂性：巨擘关系和机构分化。这些维度共同决定了国度和其他举止者在罢黜轨制章程时所面对的机遇和方法。因此，它们塑造了紧迫的收尾，举例战略调养、轨制革新和创建竞争性轨制。本文提倡了联系巨擘和分化效应的可磨真金不怕火假定，并评估它们与本专题的五篇同伴著述所揣摸的八个轨制复杂体的对应关系。咱们进一步细目了一组塑造轨制复杂体随时代演变的动态经过。咱们的框架加强了轨制复杂体的相比分析基础，并为揣摸筹办提供了新的议程。

The concept of international regime complexity offers a useful lens for examining the increasing density of international institutions in global governance. A growing literature in International Political Economy (IPE) identifies clusters of overlapping institutions in many important policy areas, yet some scholars argue that complexity undermines governance effectiveness, while others perceive distinct advantages over unified institutions. To bring coherence to these findings, we present a general theoretical framework that characterizes regime complexes based on two structural features: Authority relations and institutional differentiation. These dimensions jointly determine the opportunities and constraints that states and other actors confront as they navigate institutional rules. As a result, they shape important outcomes, such as policy adjustment, regime shifting and competitive regime creation. The article proposes testable hypotheses regarding the effects of authority and differentiation, and we assess their correspondence with the eight regime complexes examined by the five companion articles in this special issue. We further identify a set of dynamic processes that shape the evolution of regime complexes over time. Our framework strengthens the foundation for comparative analysis of regime complexes and charts a new agenda for the research program.

海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、战略变化与合作

题目：Value differentiation, policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes

作家：Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理诠释。

提要：在海外政事经济学(IPE)的很多议题范围中，国度间的合作受到密集的、不同但叠加的海外机构网罗的经管。这种“轨制复杂性”环境是增强如故削弱合作一直备受争议。有东谈主以为，叠加的机构增强了正当性和活泼性，而其他东谈主则以为，契机主见的择地选拔使得国度或者遁入投诚严格的章程。本文调处了这个争论，诠释轨制复杂性会根据轨制之间的价值各异程度产生不同的影响。在那些不具各异化机构算作替代品的议题范围中，择地选拔会裁减轨制敛迹国度步履的技艺。然则，在那些轨制机构通过价值分别的问题范围中，即即跟着章程变得愈加严格，它们提供的平正也会增多，机构叠加不错促使国度战略变革。本文叙述了这一动态变化，并在对选举不雅察和与丛林关联的碳赔偿的政权复合体进行相比分析时提供了劝诫把柄。

In many issue areas in international political economy (IPE), interstate cooperation is governed by a dense network of distinct but overlapping international institutions. Whether this environment of 'regime complexity’ strengthens or undermines cooperation is a subject of intense debate. Some argue that overlapping institutions enhance legitimacy and flexibility, while others claim that opportunistic forum shopping enables states to escape compliance with rigorous rules. This article reconciles this debate, demonstrating that regime complexity has contrasting effects depending on the degree of value differentiation among institutions. In issue areas where undifferentiated institutions function as substitutes, forum shopping will reduce the regime’s ability to discipline state behavior. However, in issue areas where institutions are differentiated by value – i.e. the benefits they provide increase as rules become more rigorous – institutional overlap can increase policy change among states. I demonstrate these dynamics formally and provide empirical evidence in a comparative analysis of the regime complexes for election observation and forest-related carbon offsets.

编译 | 朱嘉成 崔育涞

校对 | 崔育涞 朱嘉成

排版 | 赵弘宇

本文源于《海外政事经济学驳斥》，本文为公益共享，工作于科研教学，不代表本平台不雅点。如有松开，接待指正。

图片

本站仅提供存储工作，总计内容均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权内容，请点击举报。